Abstract
In practice, open-market stock repurchase programs outnumber self tender offers by approximately 10-1. This evidence is puzzling given that tender offers are more efficient in disbursing free cash and in signaling undervaluation - the two main motivations suggested in the literature for repurchasing shares. We provide a theoretical model to explore this puzzle. In the model, tender offers disburse free cash quickly but induce information asymmetry and hence require a price premium. Open-market programs disburse free cash slowly, and hence do not require a price premium, but because they are slow, result in partial free cash waste. The model predicts that the likelihood that a tender offer will be chosen over an open-market program increases with the agency costs of free cash and decreases with uncertainty (risk), information asymmetry, ownership concentration, and liquidity. These predictions are generally consistent with the empirical evidence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3174-3187 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Banking and Finance |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2011 |
Keywords
- Buyback
- Free cash
- Open-market program
- Payout policy
- Repurchase
- Stock repurchase
- Tender offer
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Stock repurchases: How firms choose between a self tender offer and an open-market program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver