Abstract
Liberal citizens are held ethically accountable not only for their own acts and behaviors, but also those of their state. Reciprocally, a proper liberal subject is one that metonymizes with the state, merging their fates and moral worth, and taking personal responsibility for the state’s actions. I claim that as a result, the liberal subject is not only self-authorizing according to liberal theories of moral autonomy, but also state-authorizing. I demonstrate the above claims through a consideration of changing activist practices among the Israeli political left. I show that the hegemonic model of civic engagement is oriented towards the state and state policy as the privileged and naturalized site of ethical intervention. I then describe the ways this model hampers political endeavors by restricting the sites of intervention as well as structural access to political participation. I also consider contemporary efforts at political engagement that bypass the state.
| Original language | English GB |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 467-486 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Theory and Society |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Aug 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Activism
- Ethics
- Hegemony
- Israeli political left
- Liberalism
- State
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'State-authorizing citizenship: the narrow field of civic engagement in the liberal age'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver