Standing on each other's shoulders: A case of coalescence between geometric discourses in peer interaction

Naama Ben-Dor, Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we draw on the commognitive theory to examine novice students’ transition from familiar mathematics meta-rules to less familiar ones during peer interaction. To pursue this goal, we focused on a relatively symmetric interaction between two middle-school students given a geometric task. During their dyadic problem-solving, the students transitioned from configural procedures to deductive ones. We found that this transition included an interactive coalescence pattern in which one student “borrowed” her partner's configural sub-procedures and built on them to develop a new deductive procedure. Furthermore, we found that during their peer interaction, the students oscillated between configural, coalesced and deductive procedures. Several patterns in the students’ interpretation of the task-situation contributed to these oscillations. We discuss the contribution of our findings to commognitive research, to geometry learning research and to peer learning research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100900
JournalJournal of Mathematical Behavior
Volume64
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Critical transition
  • Deductive discourse
  • Geometric proof
  • Oscillations in learning
  • Peer interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standing on each other's shoulders: A case of coalescence between geometric discourses in peer interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this