Abstract
In this paper we draw on the commognitive theory to examine novice students’ transition from familiar mathematics meta-rules to less familiar ones during peer interaction. To pursue this goal, we focused on a relatively symmetric interaction between two middle-school students given a geometric task. During their dyadic problem-solving, the students transitioned from configural procedures to deductive ones. We found that this transition included an interactive coalescence pattern in which one student “borrowed” her partner's configural sub-procedures and built on them to develop a new deductive procedure. Furthermore, we found that during their peer interaction, the students oscillated between configural, coalesced and deductive procedures. Several patterns in the students’ interpretation of the task-situation contributed to these oscillations. We discuss the contribution of our findings to commognitive research, to geometry learning research and to peer learning research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100900 |
| Journal | Journal of Mathematical Behavior |
| Volume | 64 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- Critical transition
- Deductive discourse
- Geometric proof
- Oscillations in learning
- Peer interaction
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Education
- Applied Psychology
- Applied Mathematics