Sovereignty over natural resources and its implications for climate justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In the current international system, sovereign states hold extensive rights over the natural resources in their territories. How are sovereign rights in natural resources justified? What are the implications of these rights for the demands of climate justice, which pertain to the use and management of natural resources-for example, rainforests? This article reviews five theories of territorial rights, in contemporary political and legal philosophy, and the justifications that they provide for territorial jurisdiction over natural resources. It is argued that insofar as the philosophical-normative perspectives justify sovereigns' jurisdiction over natural resources within their borders, they also give rise to limits on the legitimate and permissible exercise of the jurisdictional prerogative. This theoretical proposition is then illustrated in the case of international climate-justice obligations of rain-forest-rich countries.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)238-250
Number of pages13
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Atmospheric Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Sovereignty over natural resources and its implications for climate justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this