Social choice for agents with general utilities

Hongyao Ma, Reshef Meir, David C. Parkes

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

The existence of truthful social choice mechanisms strongly depends on whether monetary transfers are allowed. Without payments there are no truthful, non-dictatorial mechanisms under mild requirements, whereas the VCG mechanism guarantees truthfulness along with welfare maximization when there are payments and utility is quasi-linear in money. In this paper we study mechanisms in which we can use payments but where agents have non quasi-linear utility functions. Our main result extends the Gibbard-Satterthwaite impossibility result by showing that, for two agents, the only truthful mechanism for at least three alternatives under general decreasing utilities remains dictatorial. We then show how to extend the VCG mechanism to work under a more general utility space than quasilinear (the parallel domain) and show that the parallel domain is maximal-no mechanism with the VCG properties exists in any larger domain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-351
Number of pages7
JournalIJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Volume2016-January
StatePublished - 2016
Event25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2016 - New York, United States
Duration: 9 Jul 201615 Jul 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this