Abstract
Waterfront redevelopment projects have often been criticized for prioritizing attractive skylines and glittering facades over the needs of local communities. Recently, however, they have increasingly seen goals of social and environmental justice integrated into their vision statements. This article focuses on the redevelopment of the Anacostia River in Washington, D.C. Since the early 2000s, the formerly neglected and contaminated river has been at the center of extensive regeneration efforts through the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative (AWI). We examine to what extent the AWI has helped to overcome inequities between the two disparate sides of the river. To answer this question, we build on interviews, analysis of planning documents, and site visits. Examining efforts toward both social and environmental justice, we show the convergence of the two but also the contradictions that arise between them. The findings suggest that employing a joint social and environmental justice approach to analyze waterfront redevelopments is important to reveal these tensions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1779-1810 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Urban Affairs Review |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Nov 2020 |
Keywords
- Anacostia River
- Washington, D.C
- environmental justice
- social justice
- waterfront redevelopment
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Urban Studies