Single vs. Two-loop full-state multi-input multi-output missile guidance

Maital Levy, Tal Shima, Shaul Gutman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Two types of autopilot-guidance schemes for linear quadratic multiple-input multiple- output missile systems are compared - single-loop and two-loop configurations. In both cases, all the states are fed-back into the guidance loop. In the two-loop case, the inner autopilot loop is designed separately from the outer guidance loop, where in the single- loop scheme, the guidance command is injected directly to the actuator, without a definite autopilot. It is proven that the two schemes achieve the same performance if and only if the number of guidance commands is identical to the number of available controllers. Thus, using the full-state two-loop scheme is preferred, since it ensures a stabilized airframe whether the guidance loop is active or not. The theorem and guidance laws are illustrated using a dual control missile model.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
EventAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference - Boston, MA, United States
Duration: 19 Aug 201322 Aug 2013

Publication series

NameAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference

Conference

ConferenceAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityBoston, MA
Period19/08/1322/08/13

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Control and Systems Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Single vs. Two-loop full-state multi-input multi-output missile guidance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this