Abstract
Full-state approach to designing nonlinear autopilot and guidance systems with bounded controls (servo command or acceleration command) is presented. Two types of full-state architectures are considered: full-state single-loop and full-state two-loop. In the full-state single-loop case, the guidance command is injected directly to the actuator, whereas in the full-state two-loop case, it is the input to the autopilot loop. It is proven that the two full-state architectures are equivalent for nonlinear systems for any cost function if there is a unique mapping from the servo command and state sets into the guidance command set. This result encourages the use of the full-state two-loop architecture over the full-state single-loop one because it ensures a stabilized vehicle if the guidance loop is inactive. The theorem and guidance laws are illustrated via a dual-control missile in an endo-atmospheric interception scenario.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1968-1977 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2017 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Aerospace Engineering
- Space and Planetary Science
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Applied Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Single versus two-loop full-state guidance and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver