Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures

Daniel Sznycer, John Tooby, Leda Cosmides, Roni Porat, Shaul Shalvi, Eran Halperin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


We test the theory that shame evolved as a defense against being devalued by others. By hypothesis, shame is a neurocomputational program tailored by selection to orchestrate cognition, motivation, physiology, and behavior in the service of: (i) deterring the individual from making choices where the prospective costs of devaluation exceed the benefits, (ii) preventing negative information about the self from reaching others, and (iii) minimizing the adverse effects of devaluation when it occurs. Because the unnecessary activation of a defense is costly, the shame system should estimate the magnitude of the devaluative threat and use those estimates to cost-effectively calibrate its activation: Traits or actions that elicit more negative evaluations from others should elicit more shame. As predicted, shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation in the United States (r = .69), India (r = .79), and Israel (r = .67). Moreover, shame in each country strongly tracks devaluation in the others, suggesting that shame and devaluation are informed by a common species-wide logic of social valuation. The shame-devaluation link is also specific: Sadness and anxiety-emotions that coactivate with shame-fail to track devaluation. To our knowledge, this constitutes the first empirical demonstration of a close, specific match between shame and devaluation within and across cultures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2625-2630
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Issue number10
StatePublished - 8 Mar 2016


  • Culture
  • Emotion
  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Shame
  • Valuation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General


Dive into the research topics of 'Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this