Abstract
Placebo response theory and set and setting theory are two fields which examine how non-biological factors shape the response to therapy. Both consider factors such as expectancy, preparation and beliefs to be crucial for understanding the extra-pharmacological processes which shape the response to drugs. Yet there are also fundamental differences between the two theories. Set and setting concerns itself with response to psychoactive drugs only; placebo theory relates to all therapeutic interventions. Placebo theory is aimed at medical professionals; set and setting theory is aimed at professionals and drug users alike. Placebo theory is primarily descriptive, describing how placebo acts; set and setting theory is primarily prescriptive, educating therapists and users on how to control and optimize the effects of drugs. This paper examines how placebo theory and set and setting theory can complement and benefit each other, broadening our understanding of how non-biological factors shape response to drugs and other treatment interventions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1259-1267 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Psychopharmacology |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Early online date | 16 Nov 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Placebo
- expectancy
- hallucinogens
- non-drug factors
- psychedelics
- set and setting
- social pharmacology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pharmacology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Pharmacology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Set and setting, psychedelics and the placebo response: An extra-pharmacological perspective on psychopharmacology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver