Abstract
We argue that policymakers may have personal interests in policy restraints channeled through public oversight. Self-imposition of public oversight can be beneficial for the policymaker because it may help alleviate the dynamic inconsistency problem that she otherwise faces. In the setting studied herein, self-imposed public oversight takes the form of a ceiling on tax rates, which can be overridden only with the legislature’s consent. Such a mechanism is shown to credibly commit the policymaker to future tax restraint, thus inducing larger productive effort.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 95-109 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Public Choice |
| Volume | 175 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Apr 2018 |
Keywords
- Dynamic inconsistency
- Legislative oversight
- Tax caps
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics