Abstract
What is the largest constant α such that for all ɛ > 0, an n × n and (Formula presented.) matrices can be multiplied in (Formula presented.) ? Coppersmith (1982) was the first to present a lower bound on α, showing that (Formula presented.). Coppersmith further proposes a second proof that leads to the bound (Formula presented.), and combined with a newer construction by Coppersmith and Winograd (1982), the second bound improves to (Formula presented.). We revisit this work, show that the second proof is incorrect, and propose an alternative one. Our alternative proof uses a recursive construction, based on the Schönhage’s multiplication stacking technique, that converges to the same bound on α.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2388334 |
| Journal | Research in Mathematics |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Fast matrix multiplication
- algebraic complexity
- lower bounds
- rectangular matrices
- tensor rank
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting “Rapid multiplication of rectangular matrices”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver