Response to: “Letter to the Editor, International Urology and Nephrology: in silico–in vitro–in vivo—can numerical simulations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) replace studies of the urinary tract?”

Tal Amitay Rosen, Alon Nissan, Yaniv Shilo, Ishai Dror, Brian Berkowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

Thus, the key to advancing our science, and medical (and ultimately clinical) understanding, is to treat these three approaches—in vivo, in vitro, in silico—as fully complementary tools, each with strengths and limitations, that taken together will lead to extensive advances in the study of urological pathologies and treatments. [last paragraph in lieu of abstract]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1837-1838
Number of pages2
JournalInternational Urology and Nephrology
Volume53
Early online date27 May 2021
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to: “Letter to the Editor, International Urology and Nephrology: in silico–in vitro–in vivo—can numerical simulations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) replace studies of the urinary tract?”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this