Reprogramming the topology of the nociceptive circuit in C. elegans reshapes sexual behavior

Vladyslava Pechuk, Gal Goldman, Yehuda Salzberg, Aditi H Chaubey, R Aaron Bola, Jonathon R Hoffman, Morgan L Endreson, Renee M Miller, Noah J Reger, Douglas S Portman, Denise M Ferkey, Elad Schneidman, Meital Oren-Suissa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The effect of the detailed connectivity of a neural circuit on its function and the resulting behavior of the organism is a key question in many neural systems. Here, we study the circuit for nociception in C. elegans, which is composed of the same neurons in the two sexes that are wired differently. We show that the nociceptive sensory neurons respond similarly in the two sexes, yet the animals display sexually dimorphic behaviors to the same aversive stimuli. To uncover the role of the downstream network topology in shaping behavior, we learn and simulate network models that replicate the observed dimorphic behaviors and use them to predict simple network rewirings that would switch behavior between the sexes. We then show experimentally that these subtle synaptic rewirings indeed flip behavior. Interestingly, when presented with aversive cues, rewired males were compromised in finding mating partners, suggesting that network topologies that enable efficient avoidance of noxious cues have a reproductive “cost.” Our results present a deconstruction of the design of a neural circuit that controls sexual behavior and how to reprogram it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4372-4385.e7
Number of pages22
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume32
Issue number20
Early online date7 Sep 2022
DOIs
StatePublished - 24 Oct 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reprogramming the topology of the nociceptive circuit in C. elegans reshapes sexual behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this