@inproceedings{00d04a9d3f114876a165e2c246cb344c,
title = "Reproduction of duration: How should I count the ways?",
abstract = "We take a close look at the task of prospective time reproduction, wherein an individual is aware of the fact that she will subsequently be asked to reproduce a demarked duration. Our participants were either explicitly instructed not to count, or were allowed to count. When participants are allowed to count, their reproductions (R) tend to be a linear function of target duration (D). When instructed not to count, they exhibited a shorter log(R) mean value than those who were allowed to count. Participants not counting are thus less veridical in time estimation. Given that for them β<1, this suggests that subjective time for them is not a linear function of physical time. We further contrast four major indices relating reproduced time to target duration: R/D, D/R, |R-D|, and |R-D|/D. While the D/R ratio score detected the difference between groups; this was not the case for the other measures.",
keywords = "Absolute discrepancy, Absolute error, Psychophysics, Ratio score, Time estimation, Time reproduction",
author = "Joseph Glicksohn and Rotem Leshem",
note = "Place of conference:Athens, Greece; COST TD0904 International Workshop on Multidisciplinary Aspects of Time and Time Perception ; Conference date: 07-10-2010 Through 08-10-2010",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-21478-3_7",
language = "الإنجليزيّة",
isbn = "9783642214776",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
pages = "79--91",
booktitle = "Multidisciplinary Aspects of Time and Time Perception - COST TD0904 International Workshop, Revised Selected Papers",
}