Religiosity, social solidarity, and cultural participation

Danijela Gavrilović, Tally Katz-Gerro, Frédéric Lebaron, Predrag Cvetičanin, Avi Astor, Nemanja Krstić

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The relation between religiosity and social solidarity is a classic topic in sociology. In contemporary societies, this relation has been influenced by secularisation, religious revitalisation, fundamentalism, and nationalism, among other cultural processes. This chapter examines the relationship between religiosity, social solidarity, and cultural participation in nine European societies using multiple correspondence analysis. The primary objective is to determine whether there is a connection between the respondent’s religiosity, their social openness and trust, their perception of the level of solidarity in their societies, and their cultural practices. The analysis shows that such connections exist, even though many social factors mediate them. The authors first mapped dimensions of solidarity, then linked these to religious affiliations, and finally incorporated cultural participation patterns into the examination. Concretely, certain religious affiliations exhibit stronger agreement with dimensions of solidarity than others. The perception of solidarity in society tends to be lower among Muslims and Orthodox Christians. However, personal openness towards other cultures and the willingness to connect with them is higher among these groups.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationEngagement with Culture in Transformative Times
Subtitle of host publicationMapping the Societal Drivers and Impacts of Cultural Understandings, Practices, Perceptions, and Values across Europe
Pages281-302
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9781040276662
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Religiosity, social solidarity, and cultural participation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this