Abstract
We tested the effects of diglossia and orthography on reading in Arabic, manipulating reading in Spoken Arabic (SA), using Arabizi, in which it is written using Latin letters on computers/phones, and the two forms of the conventional written form Modern Standard Arabic (MSA): vowelled (shallow) and unvowelled (deep). 77 skilled readers in 8th grade performed oral reading of single words and narrative and expository texts, and silent reading comprehension of both genres of text. Oral reading and comprehension revealed different patterns. Single words and texts were read faster and more accurately in unvoweled MSA, slowest and least accurately in vowelled MSA, and in-between in Arabizi. Comprehension was highest for vowelled MSA. Narrative texts were better than expository texts in Arabizi with the opposite pattern in MSA. The results suggest that frequency of type of texts and the way in which phonology is encoded affect skilled reading.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2291-2316 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Reading and Writing |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Arabic
- Arabizi
- Computer Mediated Communication
- Diglossia
- Modern Standard Arabic
- Reading
- Spoken Arabic
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Education
- Linguistics and Language
- Speech and Hearing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reading in multiple Arabics: effects of diglossia and orthography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver