Re-playing and quality contribution: The role of the score mechanism design as motivator

Sheizaf Rafaeli, Daphne Raban, Ganit Richter

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The current study investigates how the game points allocation function affects quality of responses and replaying behavior in a game-for-crowds implementation. In a series of experiments, we compare between two scoring designs across two types of users: students and public. Two reward- based mechanisms differing in the mathematical function were applied: linear (y=3x) vs. exponential (y=6ex). Findings highlight the nuances between repeated game rounds, types of users and quality contribution. We find support for the importance of the mathematical function of scores assignment as a motivator. Insights into the design of effective game-for-crowds for different target groups are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of Meaningful Play
EditorsBrian Winn, Rabindra Ratan, Elizabeth LaPensee
Place of PublicationPittsburgh, PA
Pages237-250
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Re-playing and quality contribution: The role of the score mechanism design as motivator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this