Rates, indications, and speech perception outcomes of revision cochlear implantations

Doron Sagiv, Yifat Yaar-Soffer, Ziva Yakir, Yael Henkin, Yisgav Shapira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Revision cochlear implant (RCI) is a growing burden on cochlear implant programs. While reports on RCI rate are frequent, outcome measures are limited. The objectives of the current study were to: (1) evaluate RCI rate, (2) classify indications, (3) delineate the pre-RCI clinical course, and (4) measure surgical and speech perception outcomes, in a large cohort of patients implanted in a tertiary referral center between 1989–2018. Retrospective data review was performed and included patient demographics, medical records, and audiologic outcomes. Results indicated that RCI rate was 11.7% (172/1465), with a trend of increased RCI load over the years. The main indications for RCI were device-related failures (soft-45.4%, hard-23.8%), medical failure (14%), trauma (8.1%), and surgical failure (6.4%). Success rate was 98.8%. Children comprised 78% (134) of the cohort and were more likely than adults to undergo RCI. Most (70%) of the RCIs were performed within 10 years from primary implantation. Speech perception outcome analysis revealed unchanged or improved performance in 85% of the cases and declined performance in 15%. Current findings confirm that RCI is a safe with high clinical efficacy; however, the non-negligible percentage of patients that exhibited declined performance post-RCI should be considered in decision-making processes regarding RCI. Routine follow-up during their first years post-implantation is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3215
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume10
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Cochlear implant
  • Device failure
  • Hard failure
  • Revision cochlear implant
  • Soft fail-ure
  • Speech perception

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rates, indications, and speech perception outcomes of revision cochlear implantations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this