Abstract
This article discusses what I call the proxy narrative, a type of narrative in which a key scene or plot sequence can be read most meaningfully as a substitute for a counterfactual alternative that cannot otherwise be narrated. Building on existing critical applications of possible world semantics and counterfactual reasoning to narrative theory, I offer several case studies culminating in an extended discussion of The Ambassadors-and, particularly, of its critically contested final scene-to illustrate the extent to which recognition of the proxy narratives embedded in traditional plots can enrich our readings of even the most familiar texts. Unable plausibly or ethically to depict a renunciation scene between Strether and Madame de Vionnet, James uses the final encounter between Strether and Maria Gostrey, I argue, to enact a discursively necessary outcome that the logic of story otherwise precludes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 28-49 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Narrative |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Counterfactual plot
- Henry james
- Possible world semantics
- Proxy narrative
- The ambassadors
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Literature and Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Proxy narrative in the ambassadors: Reconfiguring James's Ending'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver