Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Proofs and Retributions, Or: Why Sarah Can’t Take Limits

Vladimir Kanovei, Karin U. Katz, Mikhail G. Katz, Mary Schaps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The small, the tiny, and the infinitesimal (to quote Paramedic) have been the object of both fascination and vilification for millenia. One of the most vitriolic reviews in mathematics was that written by Errett Bishop about Keisler’s book Elementary Calculus: an Infinitesimal Approach. In this skit we investigate both the argument itself, and some of its roots in Bishop George Berkeley’s criticism of Leibnizian and Newtonian Calculus. We also explore some of the consequences to students for whom the infinitesimal approach is congenial. The casual mathematical reader may be satisfied to read the text of the five act play, whereas the others may wish to delve into the 130 footnotes, some of which contain elucidation of the mathematics or comments on the history.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalFoundations of Science
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Abraham Robinson
  • Errett Bishop
  • Hyperreals
  • Infinitesimals
  • Intuitionists
  • Petard

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Proofs and Retributions, Or: Why Sarah Can’t Take Limits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this