Abstract
The small, the tiny, and the infinitesimal (to quote Paramedic) have been the object of both fascination and vilification for millenia. One of the most vitriolic reviews in mathematics was that written by Errett Bishop about Keisler’s book Elementary Calculus: an Infinitesimal Approach. In this skit we investigate both the argument itself, and some of its roots in Bishop George Berkeley’s criticism of Leibnizian and Newtonian Calculus. We also explore some of the consequences to students for whom the infinitesimal approach is congenial. The casual mathematical reader may be satisfied to read the text of the five act play, whereas the others may wish to delve into the 130 footnotes, some of which contain elucidation of the mathematics or comments on the history.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-25 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Foundations of Science |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2014 |
Keywords
- Abraham Robinson
- Errett Bishop
- Hyperreals
- Infinitesimals
- Intuitionists
- Petard
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General
- History and Philosophy of Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Proofs and Retributions, Or: Why Sarah Can’t Take Limits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver