TY - JOUR
T1 - Processing and Memory of Central and Peripheral Ideas in Reading Comprehension by Poor Comprehenders
AU - Yeari, Menahem
AU - Lev, Noa
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Society for the Scientific Study of Reading.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This study was designed to examine the ability of poor comprehenders to identify, attend, and remember central and peripheral ideas during and after reading. To address these goals, good and poor comprehenders, matched on reading (word decoding) skills and non-verbal intelligence, read three expository texts, while their eye-movements were monitored during reading. Latencies and frequency of (re)reading central and peripheral ideas were measured to assess attention allocation during reading. After reading the three texts, participants were asked to recall, recognize, and rate the centrality level of text ideas, in order to assess the extent to which they store, retrieve and identify central and peripheral ideas, respectively. Findings indicated that poor comprehenders identified, (re)read and recognized central (as compared to peripheral) ideas to the same extent as good comprehenders, whereas their recall of central ideas was significantly lower than good comprehenders. This specific retrieval deficit is further illuminated in the context of their poor integration skills.
AB - This study was designed to examine the ability of poor comprehenders to identify, attend, and remember central and peripheral ideas during and after reading. To address these goals, good and poor comprehenders, matched on reading (word decoding) skills and non-verbal intelligence, read three expository texts, while their eye-movements were monitored during reading. Latencies and frequency of (re)reading central and peripheral ideas were measured to assess attention allocation during reading. After reading the three texts, participants were asked to recall, recognize, and rate the centrality level of text ideas, in order to assess the extent to which they store, retrieve and identify central and peripheral ideas, respectively. Findings indicated that poor comprehenders identified, (re)read and recognized central (as compared to peripheral) ideas to the same extent as good comprehenders, whereas their recall of central ideas was significantly lower than good comprehenders. This specific retrieval deficit is further illuminated in the context of their poor integration skills.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086023335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1759073
DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1759073
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1088-8438
VL - 25
SP - 215
EP - 233
JO - Scientific Studies of Reading
JF - Scientific Studies of Reading
IS - 3
ER -