Probabilism reconsidered: Deference to experts, types of uncertainty, and medicines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Probabilist moral theologians held that, in situations of uncertainty, it is morally permissible for an expert to defer to an opinion regarded as less probable than his own (which he retains unchanged). Probabilism has been customarily taken to answer the question: "how should I act in circumstances of moral uncertainty?" I argue that originally it constituted an answer to the very different question: "what weight should experts assign to the opinions of their peers when providing advice to laymen?" Critics charged that medical cases show that probabilism is wrong. I analyze three attempts by probabilists to address this charge.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)373-393
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of the History of Ideas
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Probabilism reconsidered: Deference to experts, types of uncertainty, and medicines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this