TY - JOUR
T1 - Private funding in public education
T2 - which values underlie the decision-making process?
AU - Meoded, Ruth
AU - BenDavid-Hadar, Iris
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Fiscal decentralisation in education shifts financial responsibilities from the central to the local government, exacerbating its complexity due to local involvement in the decision-making process. Competing values are key to this complexity (e.g. equity/liberty). The objective of this study is twofold: First, we examine the disparities in the private funding of public education. Second, we analyse the values that underlie the policy-making process of the local authorities in Israel. Using nationwide administrative data and interviews with local policymakers, we found that affluent, centrally located authorities allocate more resources, prioritising choice and excellence, whereas less affluent authorities emphasise equity and need-based allocation. Our findings contribute to the framework by adding innovation as a more contemporary value that underlies the decision-making process. Our study suggests that fiscal decentralisation may impede educational equity due to competing values, thus underscoring the need for reforming central education finance policy by prioritising equitable education.
AB - Fiscal decentralisation in education shifts financial responsibilities from the central to the local government, exacerbating its complexity due to local involvement in the decision-making process. Competing values are key to this complexity (e.g. equity/liberty). The objective of this study is twofold: First, we examine the disparities in the private funding of public education. Second, we analyse the values that underlie the policy-making process of the local authorities in Israel. Using nationwide administrative data and interviews with local policymakers, we found that affluent, centrally located authorities allocate more resources, prioritising choice and excellence, whereas less affluent authorities emphasise equity and need-based allocation. Our findings contribute to the framework by adding innovation as a more contemporary value that underlies the decision-making process. Our study suggests that fiscal decentralisation may impede educational equity due to competing values, thus underscoring the need for reforming central education finance policy by prioritising equitable education.
KW - education finance
KW - equity
KW - Fiscal decentralisation
KW - local authority
KW - policy
KW - values
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214922962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2024.2446879
DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2024.2446879
M3 - مقالة
SN - 0022-0620
JO - Journal of educational administration and history
JF - Journal of educational administration and history
ER -