Preferred listening levels of personal listening devices in young teenagers: Self reports and physical measurements

Chava Muchnik, Noam Amir, Ester Shabtai, Ricky Kaplan-Neeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Objective: To assess the potential risk of hearing loss to young listeners, due to the use of personal listening devices (PLDs). Design: The study included two parts: (1) A self-report questionnaire on music listening habits, and (2) Physical measurements of preferred listening levels, in quiet and in everyday background noise. Study sample: Young teenagers aged 13 to 17 years. Part 1 included 289 participants with mean age of 14 years. Part 2 included 11 and 74 participants (2A and 2B) with a mean age of 15 years. Eleven listened to PLDs in quiet conditions (2A) and 74 in everyday background noise (2B). Results: Questionnaire main findings indicated that most of the participants reported high or very high volume settings and demonstrated low awareness towards loud music listening consequences. Physical measurements corrected for diffuse field indicated mean preferred listening levels of: 82 (SD = 9) dBA in quiet, and 89 (SD = 9) dBA in the presence of background noise. The potential risk to hearing of PLDs users was calculated using the 8 hour equivalent level. Conclusion: More than 25% of the participants in the noisy condition were found to be at risk according to occupational damage risk criteria NIOSH, 1998.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-293
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Audiology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2012


  • Personal listening devices
  • Physical measurements
  • Preferred listening levels
  • Self reporting questionnaires
  • Young teenagers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing


Dive into the research topics of 'Preferred listening levels of personal listening devices in young teenagers: Self reports and physical measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this