Personal information retrieval: smartphones vs. computers, emails vs. files

Ofer Bergman, Nimrod Yanai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Millions of people retrieve their emails and files using their smartphones, yet smartphone retrieval of such personal information has never been studied or compared to retrievals from PCs. In our within-subjects study, we compared the retrievals of our 57 participants in four conditions: files using PCs, emails using PCs, files using smartphones, and emails using smartphones. Our results indicate that when using smartphones, retrievals were significantly less successful and efficient than when using PCs, casting doubt on the implicit assumption that the use of these devices is equivalent. Our results also indicate that participants used the search facility for emails about seven times more than for files, which can encourage vendors to invest more efforts in improving email search engines and file navigation systems. Finally, we found that the tendency to search shows interpersonal differences but consistency across different situations for the same individual and therefore can be regarded as a personal trait. Future research can attempt to explain the search tendency trait in terms of cognitive abilities and personality traits, incorporating it to well-established theories. This may pave the way to a new trait-related theory in the field of information science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)621-632
Number of pages12
JournalPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Emails
  • Files
  • Information retrieval
  • Personal information management
  • Smartphones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personal information retrieval: smartphones vs. computers, emails vs. files'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this