Abstract
We argue that the move to free and fair elections is only the first step in a democratic transition. With this change, competition moves into the legislative arena, where interests are defined not in terms of support or opposition to the old regime, but over competing visions of what government should do. Thus, examining legislative behavior and legislative outcomes helps us to understand the long-term political and policy trajectory of democratic transitions. Building on game-theoretic analysis of majority-rule decision-making, our hypothesis is that, after controlling for factors such as seat share, party survival depends on party relevance—the organization’s influence over legislative outcomes. Using legislative roll call data from Hungary, Poland, Russia and Ukraine, we show that relevance is a major influence on party survival, even after controlling for seat shares and other factors. The last section of the paper discusses the implications of these results for democracy assistance programs.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 251-261 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | International Area Studies Review |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Democratic consolidation
- Democratic transitions
- Legislative process
- Majority rule
- Uncovered set
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science