Abstract
This commentary focuses on two related, open questions in Hulleman & Olivers' (H&O's) proposal: (1) the nature of the parallel attentive process that determines target presence within, and thus presumably the size of, the functional visual field, and (2) how the pre-attentive guidance mechanism must be conceived to also account for search performance in tasks that afford no reliable target-based guidance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e149 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 40 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Parallel attentive processing and pre-attentive guidance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver