Abstract
Resolving conflicting ecosystem management goals - such as maintaining fisheries while conserving marine species or harvesting timber while preserving habitat - is a widely recognized challenge. Even more challenging may be conflicts between two conservation goals that are typically considered complementary. Here, we model a case where eradication of an invasive plant, hybrid Spartina, threatens the recovery of an endangered bird that uses Spartina for nesting. Achieving both goals requires restoration of native Spartina. We show that the optimal management entails less intensive treatment over longer time scales to fit with the time scale of natural processes. In contrast, both eradication and restoration, when considered separately, would optimally proceed as fast as possible. Thus, managers should simultaneously consider multiple, potentially conflicting goals, which may require flexibility in the timing of expenditures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1028-1031 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Science |
| Volume | 344 |
| Issue number | 6187 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver