TY - GEN
T1 - Online scheduling with interval conflicts
AU - Halldórsson, Magnús M.
AU - Patt-Shamir, Boaz
AU - Rawitz, Dror
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - In the problem of Scheduling with Interval Conflicts, there is a ground set of items indexed by integers, and the input is a collection of conflicts, each containing all the items whose index lies within some interval on the real line. Conflicts arrive in an online fashion. A scheduling algorithm must select, from each conflict, at most one survivor item, and the goal is to maximize the number (or weight) of items that survive all the conflicts they are involved in. We present a centralized deterministic online algorithm whose competitive ratio is O (lgσ), where σ is the size of the largest conflict. For the distributed setting, we present another deterministic algorithm whose competitive ratio is 2lgσ, in the special contiguous case, in which the item indices constitute a contiguous interval of integers. Our upper bounds are complemented by two lower bounds: one that shows that even in the contiguous case, all deterministic algorithms (centralized or distributed) have competitive ratio Ω(lg σ), and that in the non-contiguous case, no deterministic oblivious algorithm (i.e., a distributed algorithm that does not use communication) can have a bounded competitive ratio.
AB - In the problem of Scheduling with Interval Conflicts, there is a ground set of items indexed by integers, and the input is a collection of conflicts, each containing all the items whose index lies within some interval on the real line. Conflicts arrive in an online fashion. A scheduling algorithm must select, from each conflict, at most one survivor item, and the goal is to maximize the number (or weight) of items that survive all the conflicts they are involved in. We present a centralized deterministic online algorithm whose competitive ratio is O (lgσ), where σ is the size of the largest conflict. For the distributed setting, we present another deterministic algorithm whose competitive ratio is 2lgσ, in the special contiguous case, in which the item indices constitute a contiguous interval of integers. Our upper bounds are complemented by two lower bounds: one that shows that even in the contiguous case, all deterministic algorithms (centralized or distributed) have competitive ratio Ω(lg σ), and that in the non-contiguous case, no deterministic oblivious algorithm (i.e., a distributed algorithm that does not use communication) can have a bounded competitive ratio.
KW - Competitive analysis
KW - Compound tasks
KW - Distributed algorithms
KW - Interval conflicts
KW - Online scheduling
KW - Online set packing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880253556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2011.472
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2011.472
M3 - منشور من مؤتمر
SN - 9783939897255
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
SP - 472
EP - 483
BT - 28th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2011
T2 - 28th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2011
Y2 - 10 March 2011 through 12 March 2011
ER -