TY - JOUR
T1 - Online Scheduling with Interval Conflicts
AU - Halldórsson, Magnús M.
AU - Patt-Shamir, Boaz
AU - Rawitz, Dror
N1 - Funding Information: An extended abstract was presented at the 28th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), 2011. M.M. Halldórsson supported in part by the Icelandic Research Fund (grant 90032021). B. Patt-Shamir and D. Rawitz research supported in part by the Next Generation Video (NeGeV) Consortium, Israel. B. Patt-Shamir supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation (grant 1372/09) and by a grant from Israel Ministry of Science and Technology.
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - In the problem of Scheduling with Interval Conflicts, there is a ground set of items indexed by integers, and the input is a collection of conflicts, each containing all the items whose index lies within some interval on the real line. Conflicts arrive in an online fashion. A scheduling algorithm must select, from each conflict, at most one survivor item, and the goal is to maximize the number (or weight) of items that survive all the conflicts they are involved in. We present a centralized deterministic online algorithm whose competitive ratio is O(lgσ), where σ is the size of the largest conflict. For the distributed setting, we present another deterministic algorithm whose competitive ratio is 2⌈lg σ⌉ in the special contiguous case, in which the item indices constitute a contiguous interval of integers. Our upper bounds are complemented by two lower bounds: one that shows that even in the contiguous case, all deterministic algorithms (centralized or distributed) have competitive ratio Ω(lgσ), and that in the non-contiguous case, no deterministic oblivious algorithm (i.e., a distributed algorithm that does not use communication) can have a bounded competitive ratio.
AB - In the problem of Scheduling with Interval Conflicts, there is a ground set of items indexed by integers, and the input is a collection of conflicts, each containing all the items whose index lies within some interval on the real line. Conflicts arrive in an online fashion. A scheduling algorithm must select, from each conflict, at most one survivor item, and the goal is to maximize the number (or weight) of items that survive all the conflicts they are involved in. We present a centralized deterministic online algorithm whose competitive ratio is O(lgσ), where σ is the size of the largest conflict. For the distributed setting, we present another deterministic algorithm whose competitive ratio is 2⌈lg σ⌉ in the special contiguous case, in which the item indices constitute a contiguous interval of integers. Our upper bounds are complemented by two lower bounds: one that shows that even in the contiguous case, all deterministic algorithms (centralized or distributed) have competitive ratio Ω(lgσ), and that in the non-contiguous case, no deterministic oblivious algorithm (i.e., a distributed algorithm that does not use communication) can have a bounded competitive ratio.
KW - Competitive analysis
KW - Compound tasks
KW - Distributed algorithms
KW - Interval conflicts
KW - Online scheduling
KW - Online set packing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878797310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-012-9408-1
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-012-9408-1
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1432-4350
VL - 53
SP - 300
EP - 317
JO - Theory of Computing Systems
JF - Theory of Computing Systems
IS - 2
ER -