TY - GEN
T1 - Online budgeted maximum coverage
AU - Rawitz, Dror
AU - Rosén, Adi
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Dror Rawitz and Adi Rosén.
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - We study the ONLINE BUDGETED MAXIMUM COVERAGE (OBMC) problem. Subsets of a weighted ground set U arrive one by one, where each set has a cost. The online algorithm has to select a collection of sets, under the constraint that their cost is at most a given budget. Upon arrival of a set the algorithm must decide whether to accept or to reject the arriving set, and it may also drop previously accepted sets (preemption). Rejecting or dropping a set is irrevocable. The goal is to maximize the total weight of the elements covered by the sets in the chosen collection. We present a deterministic 4/1-r-competitive algorithm for OBMC, where r is the maximum ratio between the cost of a set and the total budget. Building on that algorithm, we then present a randomized O(1)-competitive algorithm for OBMC. On the other hand, we show that the competitive ratio of any deterministic online algorithm is Ω(1/√1-r). We also give a deterministic O(Δ)-competitive algorithm, where Δ is the maximum weight of a set (given that the minimum element weight is 1), and if the total weight of all elements, w(U), is known in advance, we show that a slight modification of that algorithm is O(min{Δ, √w(U)})-competitive. A matching lower bound of Ω(min{Δ, √w(U)}) is also given. Previous to the present work, only the unit cost version of OBMC was studied under the online setting, giving a 4-competitive algorithm [36]. Finally, our results, including the lower bounds, apply to REMOVABLE ONLINE KNAPSACK which is the preemptive version of the ONLINE KNAPSACK problem.
AB - We study the ONLINE BUDGETED MAXIMUM COVERAGE (OBMC) problem. Subsets of a weighted ground set U arrive one by one, where each set has a cost. The online algorithm has to select a collection of sets, under the constraint that their cost is at most a given budget. Upon arrival of a set the algorithm must decide whether to accept or to reject the arriving set, and it may also drop previously accepted sets (preemption). Rejecting or dropping a set is irrevocable. The goal is to maximize the total weight of the elements covered by the sets in the chosen collection. We present a deterministic 4/1-r-competitive algorithm for OBMC, where r is the maximum ratio between the cost of a set and the total budget. Building on that algorithm, we then present a randomized O(1)-competitive algorithm for OBMC. On the other hand, we show that the competitive ratio of any deterministic online algorithm is Ω(1/√1-r). We also give a deterministic O(Δ)-competitive algorithm, where Δ is the maximum weight of a set (given that the minimum element weight is 1), and if the total weight of all elements, w(U), is known in advance, we show that a slight modification of that algorithm is O(min{Δ, √w(U)})-competitive. A matching lower bound of Ω(min{Δ, √w(U)}) is also given. Previous to the present work, only the unit cost version of OBMC was studied under the online setting, giving a 4-competitive algorithm [36]. Finally, our results, including the lower bounds, apply to REMOVABLE ONLINE KNAPSACK which is the preemptive version of the ONLINE KNAPSACK problem.
KW - Budgeted coverage
KW - Competitive analysis
KW - Maximum coverage
KW - Online algorithms
KW - Removable online knapsack
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012969561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2016.73
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2016.73
M3 - منشور من مؤتمر
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - 24th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA 2016
A2 - Zaroliagis, Christos
A2 - Sankowski, Piotr
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
T2 - 24th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA 2016
Y2 - 22 August 2016 through 24 August 2016
ER -