On the International Labour Organization and prison labour: An invitation to recalibrate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article re-examines the ILO's normative outlook on prison labour, arguing that it is out of touch with the realities on the ground, where public/private hybrid forms of prison labour are proliferating. The authors bring to light the controversy surrounding the position taken by the ILO, as member States repeatedly demand that it relax, and increasingly defy, its dichotomous stance. They illustrate the heavy price to be paid if the ILO stays on its current course, but also if it adopts the position favoured by some of these member States. Instead, they point to two alternatives that go beyond these conflicting positions.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)505-524
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Labour Review
Volume159
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • ILO standards
  • forced labour
  • prison labour
  • privatization
  • public/private divide
  • role of ILO

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this