Abstract
In this paper I seek to retain many of Dormany's central claims about the excellent-making features of faith, without accepting her direct application of evidentialism to faith. In order to achieve that goal, I argue that we have to distinguish between the non-conflicting norms of (1) epistemology and (2) pistology. We also have to distinguish the often conflicting norms of epistemic and practical rationality.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-35 |
| Journal | Australasian Philosophical Review |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2020 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver