Abstract
This article examines Newton’s method of induction and its connection to methodological atomism. The article argues that Newton’s Rule III for the Study of Natural Philosophy is a criterion for isolating the primary qualities of the atomic parts; in other words, it interprets Rule III as a transductive inference. It is shown that both the standard inductive and invariance interpretations of Rule III can be subsumed under the transductive view, although the invariance criterion is reinterpreted; by qualities “that cannot be intended or remitted,” Newton means qualities that are invariant under changes in the configuration of the atomic parts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 677-697 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Philosophy of Science |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science