Abstract
We document an asymmetry in the rigidity of 9-ending prices relative to non-9-ending prices. Consumers have difficulty noticing higher prices if they are 9-ending, or noticing price-increases if the new prices are 9-ending, because 9-endings are used as a signal for low prices. Price setters respond strategically to the consumer-heuristic by setting 9-ending prices more often after price-increases than after price-decreases. 9-ending prices, therefore, remain 9-ending more often after price-increases than after price-decreases, leading to asymmetric rigidity: 9-ending prices are more rigid upward than downward. These findings hold for both transaction-prices and regular-prices, and for both inflation and no-inflation periods.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 33-49 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Monetary Economics |
| Volume | 110 |
| Early online date | 8 Jan 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2020 |
Keywords
- 9-ending prices
- Asymmetric price adjustment
- Price points
- Psychological prices
- Regular/Sale prices
- Sticky/rigid prices
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Not all price endings are created equal: Price points and asymmetric price rigidity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver