Not a Copernican observer: Biased peculiar velocity statistics in the local Universe

Wojciech A. Hellwing, Adi Nusser, Martin Feix, Maciej Bilicki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We assess the effect of the local large-scale structure on the estimation of two-point statistics of the observed radial peculiar velocities of galaxies. A large N-body simulation is used to examine these statistics from the perspective of random observers as well as 'Local Group-like' observers conditioned to reside in an environment resembling the observed Universe within 20 Mpc. The local environment systematically distorts the shape and amplitude of velocity statistics with respect to ensemble-averaged measurements made by a Copernican (random) observer. The Virgo cluster has the most significant impact, introducing large systematic deviations in all the statistics. For a simple 'top-hat' selection function, an idealized survey extending to ∼160 h−1 Mpc or deeper is needed to completely mitigate the effects of the local environment. Using shallower catalogues leads to systematic deviations of the order of 50-200 per cent depending on the scale considered. For a flat redshift distribution similar to the one of the CosmicFlows-3 survey, the deviations are even more prominent in both the shape and amplitude at all separations considered (≲100 h−1 Mpc). Conclusions based on statistics calculated without taking into account the impact of the local environment should be revisited.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2787-2796
Number of pages10
JournalMONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume467
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Cosmology: theory
  • Dark matter
  • Galaxies: haloes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Not a Copernican observer: Biased peculiar velocity statistics in the local Universe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this