Abstract
The paper discusses the cumulative aspects of flexible planning's engagement with massive public-private (PP) development ventures, tracing five ventures in Tel Aviv-Jaffa and analyzing each as a link in a chain of planning precedents. As in many other instances that materialized in this city, each venture was based on a spot-zoning elaboration of a planning deal that balanced cost and benefits for PP agencies. In each test case, public benefits and properties were bargained and official policies were modified. Neo-liberal policies have escalated planning flexibility, linking local multi-spot zoning with extreme luxury and increasingly high buildings. However, as citizens' criticism progressively questioned the legitimacy of PP planning, a judicial debate is now taking place concerning the definition and function of spatial planning. Focusing this debate and the urban planning tradition that led to it are proposed here as a way of evaluating the concrete assets of urban PP planning today.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 73-81 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Cities |
Volume | 37 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2014 |
Keywords
- Flexible planning
- Planning legitimating
- Public interest
- Public-private ventures
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Urban Studies
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management