Abstract
Some philosophers of science-myself included-appeal to fiction as an interpretation of the practice of modeling. This raises the specter of an incompatibility with realism, since fiction making is essentially nontruth regulated. I argue that the prima facie conflict can be resolved in two ways, each involving a distinct notion of fiction and a corresponding formulation of realism. The main goal of the essay is to describe these two packages. I comment also on how to choose between them.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 738-748 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver