Abstract
The main argument of the paper is that we should examine mediator-narrative as an agency in narrative construction of memory during conflict. It demonstrates how despite the differences between the US presidents’ personal world views, their strategic narrations of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are strikingly similar. These selective narratives strengthen the image of the US as a peacemaker and benevolent global leader. This narration is achieved by sidelining the detrimental role of the Israeli settlements and security threats, especially the increasing influence of Hamas in the Gaza-Strip. Therefore, this resilient mediator-narrative prevents critical thinking on the conflict and encourages a duplication of such policies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Ethnopolitics |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cultural Studies
- History
- Political Science and International Relations