TY - JOUR
T1 - Marine spatial planning
T2 - Achieving and evaluating integration
AU - Portman, Michelle
N1 - Funding Information: I gratefully acknowledge the support of the Lady Davis/Golda Meir Fellowship of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and two anonymous reviewers for their valued comments. The research has also been funded by the DEMARN project—Designation and Management of Marine Reserve Networks (European Commission, 7th Framework Programme 2007–2013 SP3-People, Grant 268115) and Project SECOA—Solutions for Environmental Contrasts in Coastal Areas (European Commission, 7th Framework Programme 2007–2013, Grant 244251).
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - Coastal states and nations are conducting marine spatial planning (MSP) at an ever-increasing pace. Some MSP efforts are aimed at planning areas at a subnational level, whereas others extend as far as 200 nautical miles from shore, within national exclusive economic zones. For planning of all types, but especially for planning in the marine realm, integration has become a sought-after norm now that traditional sectoral, single-issue management has not succeeded. Fisheries collapse, threats to marine biodiversity, and global climate change all support the case for greater integration in marine resource management and policy. The designation of boundaries can be related to the level of cross-sector and cross-jurisdictional integration achieved by MSP. The importance of scale and scope for MSP initiatives is examined, relating these aspects of plans and/or programmes to the levels of integration achieved, and a framework is suggested for evaluation. MSP initiatives in Portugal, the UK, and the USA serve as potential case studies for use of the framework.
AB - Coastal states and nations are conducting marine spatial planning (MSP) at an ever-increasing pace. Some MSP efforts are aimed at planning areas at a subnational level, whereas others extend as far as 200 nautical miles from shore, within national exclusive economic zones. For planning of all types, but especially for planning in the marine realm, integration has become a sought-after norm now that traditional sectoral, single-issue management has not succeeded. Fisheries collapse, threats to marine biodiversity, and global climate change all support the case for greater integration in marine resource management and policy. The designation of boundaries can be related to the level of cross-sector and cross-jurisdictional integration achieved by MSP. The importance of scale and scope for MSP initiatives is examined, relating these aspects of plans and/or programmes to the levels of integration achieved, and a framework is suggested for evaluation. MSP initiatives in Portugal, the UK, and the USA serve as potential case studies for use of the framework.
KW - boundary demarcation
KW - integration
KW - oceans policy
KW - sectoral management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054090242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsr157
DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsr157
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1054-3139
VL - 68
SP - 2191
EP - 2200
JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science
JF - ICES Journal of Marine Science
IS - 10
ER -