TY - JOUR
T1 - Management priorities for marine invasive species
AU - Giakoumi, Sylvaine
AU - Katsanevakis, Stelios
AU - Albano, Paolo G.
AU - Azzurro, Ernesto
AU - Cardoso, Ana Cristina
AU - Cebrian, Emma
AU - Deidun, Alan
AU - Edelist, Dor
AU - Francour, Patrice
AU - Jimenez, Carlos
AU - Mačić, Vesna
AU - Occhipinti-Ambrogi, Anna
AU - Rilov, Gil
AU - Sghaier, Yassine Ramzi
N1 - Funding Information: This work is a contribution of the ANR project “PAVIS: Assessing the relationships between marine protected areas and invasive species” (ANR-16-ACHN-0016-01) and the COST Action 15121 “MarCons: Advancing marine conservation in the European and contiguous seas” supported by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology ( CA15121 ). We would like to thank K.L. Yates for language suggestions and A. Pey for his assistance in processing the questionnaires. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/10/20
Y1 - 2019/10/20
N2 - Managing invasive alien species is particularly challenging in the ocean mainly because marine ecosystems are highly connected across broad spatial scales. Eradication of marine invasive species has only been achieved when species were detected early, and management responded rapidly. Generalized approaches, transferable across marine regions, for prioritizing actions to control invasive populations are currently lacking. Here, expert knowledge was elicited to prioritize 11 management actions for controlling 12 model species, distinguished by differences in dispersion capacity, distribution in the area to be managed, and taxonomic identity. Each action was assessed using five criteria (effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, impacts on native communities, and cost), which were combined in an ‘applicability’ metric. Raising public awareness and encouraging the commercial use of invasive species were highly prioritized, whereas biological control actions were considered the least applicable. Our findings can guide rapid decision-making on prioritizing management options for the control of invasive species especially at early stages of invasion, when reducing managers' response time is critical.
AB - Managing invasive alien species is particularly challenging in the ocean mainly because marine ecosystems are highly connected across broad spatial scales. Eradication of marine invasive species has only been achieved when species were detected early, and management responded rapidly. Generalized approaches, transferable across marine regions, for prioritizing actions to control invasive populations are currently lacking. Here, expert knowledge was elicited to prioritize 11 management actions for controlling 12 model species, distinguished by differences in dispersion capacity, distribution in the area to be managed, and taxonomic identity. Each action was assessed using five criteria (effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, impacts on native communities, and cost), which were combined in an ‘applicability’ metric. Raising public awareness and encouraging the commercial use of invasive species were highly prioritized, whereas biological control actions were considered the least applicable. Our findings can guide rapid decision-making on prioritizing management options for the control of invasive species especially at early stages of invasion, when reducing managers' response time is critical.
KW - Expert knowledge elicitation
KW - Management actions
KW - Marine conservation
KW - Marine invasive species
KW - Non-native species
KW - Prioritization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067840192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.282
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.282
M3 - Article
C2 - 31726580
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 688
SP - 976
EP - 982
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
ER -