Abstract
We address the problem of whether the brute-force procedure for the local improvement step in a local search algorithm can substantially be improved when applied to classical NP-hard string problems. We examine four of the more prominent problems in this domain: Closest String, Longest Common Subsequence, Shortest Common Supersequence, and Shortest Common Superstring. Herein, we consider arguably the most fundamental string distance measure, namely the Hamming distance, which has been applied in practical local search implementations for string problems. Our results indicate that for all four problems, the brute-force algorithm cannot be considerably improved.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 30-41 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Theoretical Computer Science |
| Volume | 525 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 13 Mar 2014 |
Keywords
- Closest String
- Local search
- Longest Common Subsequence
- Parameterized complexity
- Parameterized intractability
- Shortest Common Supersequence
- Shortest Common Superstring
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Theoretical Computer Science
- General Computer Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Local search for string problems: Brute-force is essentially optimal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver