TY - JOUR
T1 - Linear and Non-linear Dimensionality-Reduction Techniques on Full Hand Kinematics
AU - Portnova-Fahreeva, Alexandra A.
AU - Rizzoglio, Fabio
AU - Nisky, Ilana
AU - Casadio, Maura
AU - Mussa-Ivaldi, Ferdinando A.
AU - Rombokas, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Copyright © 2020 Portnova-Fahreeva, Rizzoglio, Nisky, Casadio, Mussa-Ivaldi and Rombokas.
PY - 2020/5/5
Y1 - 2020/5/5
N2 - The purpose of this study was to find a parsimonious representation of hand kinematics data that could facilitate prosthetic hand control. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a non-linear Autoencoder Network (nAEN) were compared in their effectiveness at capturing the essential characteristics of a wide spectrum of hand gestures and actions. Performance of the two methods was compared on (a) the ability to accurately reconstruct hand kinematic data from a latent manifold of reduced dimension, (b) variance distribution across latent dimensions, and (c) the separability of hand movements in compressed and reconstructed representations derived using a linear classifier. The nAEN exhibited higher performance than PCA in its ability to more accurately reconstruct hand kinematic data from a latent manifold of reduced dimension. Whereas, for two dimensions in the latent manifold, PCA was able to account for 78% of input data variance, nAEN accounted for 94%. In addition, the nAEN latent manifold was spanned by coordinates with more uniform share of signal variance compared to PCA. Lastly, the nAEN was able to produce a manifold of more separable movements than PCA, as different tasks, when reconstructed, were more distinguishable by a linear classifier, SoftMax regression. It is concluded that non-linear dimensionality reduction may offer a more effective platform than linear methods to control prosthetic hands.
AB - The purpose of this study was to find a parsimonious representation of hand kinematics data that could facilitate prosthetic hand control. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a non-linear Autoencoder Network (nAEN) were compared in their effectiveness at capturing the essential characteristics of a wide spectrum of hand gestures and actions. Performance of the two methods was compared on (a) the ability to accurately reconstruct hand kinematic data from a latent manifold of reduced dimension, (b) variance distribution across latent dimensions, and (c) the separability of hand movements in compressed and reconstructed representations derived using a linear classifier. The nAEN exhibited higher performance than PCA in its ability to more accurately reconstruct hand kinematic data from a latent manifold of reduced dimension. Whereas, for two dimensions in the latent manifold, PCA was able to account for 78% of input data variance, nAEN accounted for 94%. In addition, the nAEN latent manifold was spanned by coordinates with more uniform share of signal variance compared to PCA. Lastly, the nAEN was able to produce a manifold of more separable movements than PCA, as different tasks, when reconstructed, were more distinguishable by a linear classifier, SoftMax regression. It is concluded that non-linear dimensionality reduction may offer a more effective platform than linear methods to control prosthetic hands.
KW - dimensionality reduction
KW - kinematics
KW - neural networks
KW - principal component analysis
KW - prosthetics
KW - unsupervised learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084916999&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00429
DO - https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00429
M3 - Article
C2 - 32432105
SN - 2296-4185
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
JF - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
M1 - 429
ER -