Abstract
This article draws on a wide range of Shii periodicals and monographs from the 1950s until the present day to investigate debates on the status of Sayyids in Pakistan. I argue that the discussion by reformist and traditionalist Shii scholars (ulama) and popular preachers has remained remarkably stable over this time period. Both 'camps' have avoided talking about any theological or miracle-working role of the Prophet's kin. This phenomenon is remarkable, given the fact that Sayyids share their pedigree with the Shii Imams, who are credited with superhuman qualities. Instead, Shii reformists and traditionalists have discussed Sayyids predominantly as a specific legal category. They are merely entitled to a distinct treatment as far as their claims to charity, patterns of marriage, and deference in daily life is concerned. I hold that this reductionist and largely legalising reading of Sayyids has to do with the intense competition over religious authority in post-Partition Pakistan. For both traditionalist and reformist Shii authors, ulama, and preachers, there was no room to acknowledge Sayyids as potential further competitors in their efforts to convince the Shii public about the proper 'orthodoxy' of their specific views.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 489-504 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jul 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Shiʻi Islam
- ahl al-bait
- religious authority in post-Partition Pakistan
- status of Sayyids
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cultural Studies
- General Arts and Humanities