TY - JOUR
T1 - Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities
T2 - Does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap?
AU - Weigelt-Marom, Hayley
AU - Weintraub, Naomi
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Keyboarding has become an essential writing mode. Yet, many do not keyboard as fast as they handwrite, perhaps due to lack of efficient keyboarding skills. The current study examined the immediate and long-term effect of a touch-typing program on narrowing the gap between keyboarding and handwriting speed among higher education students. The study included 17 normally achieving students and 25 students with specific learning disabilities (i.e., reading and/or writing disabilities). Results showed that at the end of the program, handwriting remained a faster writing mode than keyboarding. This condition changed over time, and at the delayed post-test (approximately 3 months following the completion of the program), keyboarding became faster than handwriting. However, this change was significant only within the group of students with specific learning disabilities. These results stress the importance of efficient and automatic keyboarding for writing among the general population and particularly among students with specific learning disabilities.
AB - Keyboarding has become an essential writing mode. Yet, many do not keyboard as fast as they handwrite, perhaps due to lack of efficient keyboarding skills. The current study examined the immediate and long-term effect of a touch-typing program on narrowing the gap between keyboarding and handwriting speed among higher education students. The study included 17 normally achieving students and 25 students with specific learning disabilities (i.e., reading and/or writing disabilities). Results showed that at the end of the program, handwriting remained a faster writing mode than keyboarding. This condition changed over time, and at the delayed post-test (approximately 3 months following the completion of the program), keyboarding became faster than handwriting. However, this change was significant only within the group of students with specific learning disabilities. These results stress the importance of efficient and automatic keyboarding for writing among the general population and particularly among students with specific learning disabilities.
KW - Assistive technology
KW - Handwriting
KW - Keyboarding
KW - Learning disabilities
KW - Typewriting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032989384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.008
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.008
M3 - مقالة
SN - 0360-1315
VL - 117
SP - 132
EP - 140
JO - Computers and Education
JF - Computers and Education
ER -