Abstract
This paper investigates whether judge political affiliation contributes to racial and gender disparities in sentencing using data on over 500,000 federal defendants linked to sentencing judge. Exploiting random case assignment, we find that Republican-appointed judges sentence black defendants to 3.0 more months than similar non-blacks and female defendants to 2.0 fewer months than similar males compared to Democratic-appointed judges, 65 percent of the baseline racial sentence gap and 17 percent of the baseline gender sentence gap, respectively. These differences cannot be explained by other judge characteristics and grow substantially larger when judges are granted more discretion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Cambridge, Mass |
| Number of pages | 41 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
| Name | NBER working paper series |
|---|---|
| Publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
| No. | 24615 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
ULI Publication
- uli
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver