@inbook{d27de491c3b44af18a8a12bba5ff3c8b,
title = "Islamic Law as Indigenous Law: Sharīʿa Courts in Israel from a Postcolonial Perspective",
abstract = "This chapter offers a post-colonial perspective on shar{\=ı}ʿa courts in Palestine/Israel. It argues that the transformations in these courts from the late nineteenth century onwards are reminiscent of transformations that occurred in indigenous or “customary” law in colonial settings. More specifically, these courts underwent processes of modernisation, bureaucratisation, systematisation and subordination of the shar{\=ı}ʿa to state hegemony. It is further argued that shar{\=ı}ʿa courts in Israel – like “indigenous” legal institutions in colonial settings – have come to constitute, at one and the same time, an instrument of state hegemony and control and an arena of indigenous resistance. This argument is briefly illustrated with examples from the shar{\=ı}ʿa courts of Beersheba and Jerusalem.",
author = "Ido Shahar",
year = "2019",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004398269_006",
language = "الإنجليزيّة",
isbn = "9789004398214",
series = "Studies in Islamic Law and Society",
publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",
pages = "84–108",
editor = "Norbert Oberauer and Yvonne Prief and Ulrike Qubaja",
booktitle = "Legal Pluralism in Muslim Contexts",
address = "هولندا",
}