Insufficient Eye Tracking Data Leads to Errors in Evaluating Typical and Atypical Fixation Preferences

Gabrielle E. Reimann, Catherine Walsh, Kelsey D. Csumitta, Patrick McClure, Francisco Pereira, Alex Martin, Michal Ramot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


Eye tracking provides insights into social processing and its deficits in disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), especially in conjunction with dynamic, naturalistic stimuli. However, reliance on manual stimuli segmentation severely limits scalability. We assessed how the amount of available data impacts individual reliability of fixation preference for different facial features, and the effect of this reliability on between-group differences. We trained an artificial neural network to segment 22 Hollywood movie clips (7410 frames). We then analyzed fixation preferences in typically developing participants and participants with ASD as we incrementally introduced movie data for analysis. Although fixations were initially variable, results stabilized as more data was added. Additionally, while those with ASD displayed significantly fewer face-centered fixations (plt;.001), they did not differ in eye or mouth fixations. Our results highlight the validity of treating fixation preferences as a stable individual trait, and the risk of misinterpretation with insufficient data.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages34
StatePublished - 24 Sep 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Insufficient Eye Tracking Data Leads to Errors in Evaluating Typical and Atypical Fixation Preferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this