Infants' biased individuation of in-group members

Adi Zehavi Fogiel, Jonas Hermes, Hannes Rakoczy, Gil Diesendruck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Adults tend to construe members of their group as “unique individuals” more than members of other groups. This study investigated whether infants exhibit this tendency, even in regard to unfamiliar arbitrary groups. Ninety-six White 1-year-olds were assigned to an Ingroup, Outgroup, or No-Group condition, based on whether or not they shared two preferences (food and shirt color) with women appearing on video sequences. In the critical trial, infants saw two women (Ingroup, Outgroup, or No-Group) – one at a time – appearing from behind a curtain. The curtain opened to reveal only one woman. Infants in the Ingroup condition looked longer at this display than infants in the other two conditions. This suggests that infants in the Ingroup condition had a stronger expectation than those in the other two conditions that there would be two women behind the curtain. In other words, infants individuated in-group members more than out-group members.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105561
JournalCognition
Volume239
Early online date14 Jul 2023
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

Keywords

  • Group membership
  • Individuation
  • Infants
  • Intergroup bias

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Infants' biased individuation of in-group members'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this